Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Petroleum Geoscience
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Petroleum Geoscience

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Balder and Jotun – two sides of the same coin? A comparison of two Tertiary oil fields in the Norwegian North Sea

D.a.g. Bergslien
Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 349-363, 1 December 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.4.349
D.a.g. Bergslien
ExxonMobil Production Company, ESSO NORGE AS, Grenseveien 6, 4313 Sandnes/PO Box 60, 4064 Stavanger, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Balder and Jotun fields are located on the western flank of the Utsira High, close to the eastern pinch-out of a Tertiary submarine fan system. Although similar in many aspects, the fields display important depositional, structural and stratigraphic differences which influence the choice of development strategy. The subsurface development strategy for the fields has been designed to optimize oil capture and minimize risk based on the interpreted reservoir geology. Therefore, differences between the exploration histories and reservoir geology are reflected in the development strategy of the two fields.

Both fields comprise Tertiary reservoir sands shed from the East Shetland Platform and transported across the Viking Graben area onto the Utsira High by sandy debris flows and turbidites. These distal gravity flow deposits display both thin-bedded sands and thicker more massive sandstones (>100 m). In the Balder Field, an intricate interaction between deposition and soft sediment deformation processes generated a complex network of reservoir compartments with common fluid contacts. In the Jotun Field, the oil–water contact is also common between all three structures, but a gas cap is restricted to one of the structures.

  • Jotun
  • Balder
  • deep marine
  • distal fan
  • massive sandstone
View Full Text

Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in using your username and password

– GSL fellows: log in with your Lyell username and password. (Please check your access entitlements at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/fellowsaccess)
– Other users: log in with the username and password you created when you registered. Help for other users is at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyellcollection_faqs
Forgot your username or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article for 24 hours and download the PDF within the access period. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one. To download the PDF, click the 'Purchased Content' link in the receipt email.

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email sales@geolsoc.org.uk

LIBRARIANS

Administer your subscription.

CONTACT US

If you have any questions about the Lyell Collection publications website, please see the access help page or contact sales@geolsoc.org.uk

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Petroleum Geoscience: 8 (4)
Petroleum Geoscience
Volume 8, Issue 4
December 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Balder and Jotun – two sides of the same coin? A comparison of two Tertiary oil fields in the Norwegian North Sea

D.a.g. Bergslien
Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 349-363, 1 December 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.4.349
D.a.g. Bergslien
ExxonMobil Production Company, ESSO NORGE AS, Grenseveien 6, 4313 Sandnes/PO Box 60, 4064 Stavanger, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Balder and Jotun – two sides of the same coin? A comparison of two Tertiary oil fields in the Norwegian North Sea

D.a.g. Bergslien
Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 349-363, 1 December 2002, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.4.349
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Petroleum Geoscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Balder and Jotun – two sides of the same coin? A comparison of two Tertiary oil fields in the Norwegian North Sea
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Petroleum Geoscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Petroleum Geoscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Field History and Development
    • Regional Setting and Stratigraphic Framework
    • Reservoir Mapping and Geological Model
    • Development Strategy and Production Performance
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Redevelopment of the Brighton Marine Field, Trinidad . . . the early days
  • Well-bore reservoir evaluation technologies to optimize field revitalization
Show more: Articles
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Discussion on ‘Fault seal modelling – the influence of fluid properties on fault sealing capacity in hydrocarbon and CO2 systems’, Petroleum Geoscience, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2019-126
  • Reply to Discussion on ‘A knowledge database of hanging-wall traps that are dependent on fault-rock seal’, Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 496, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-157
  • Discussion on ‘A knowledge database of hanging-wall traps that are dependent on fault-rock seal’, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-157
  • Reply to Discussion on ‘Fault seal modelling – the influence of fluid properties on fault sealing capacity in hydrocarbon and CO2 systems’, Petroleum Geoscience, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2019-126
  • Geoscience and decarbonization: current status and future directions
More...

Petroleum Geoscience

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

 

EAGE logo

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1354-0793
Online ISSN 
2041-496X

Copyright © 2021 EAGE/Geological Society of London