Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Petroleum Geoscience
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Petroleum Geoscience

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Accepted manuscripts
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • All collections
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
  • Submit

Comparison of shale depth functions in contrasting offshore basins and sealing behaviour for CH4 and CO2 containment systems

Oscar J. Nhabanga and View ORCID ProfilePhilip S. Ringrose
Petroleum Geoscience, 28, petgeo2021-101, 27 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
Oscar J. Nhabanga
1Eduardo Mondlane University, 3453 Avenida Julius Nyerere, Maputo, Mozambique
2Centre of Studies in Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology, Avenida de Moçambique, km 1.5, Luis Cabral, Maputo, Mozambique
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip S. Ringrose
3Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), S. P. Andersens veg 15a, Trondheim 7031, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip S. Ringrose
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Previous
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mudrock compaction trends from the Rovuma Basin offshore Mozambique are compared with those of the Norwegian North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and the Kutai Basin offshore Indonesia. The comparison reveals that burial rates and timing of rifting are the dominant causes for the differences observed. The compaction trend for the Rovuma Basin is broadly similar to the trends for the Kutai Basin and the Gulf of Mexico, but very different from those for the Norwegian North Sea data, which show higher porosity and shallower onset of overpressure than those from the other three basins. The relationships for seismic velocities as a function of depth show strong similarities between the Rovuma and Gulf of Mexico basins.

These comparisons are used to make a general assessment of the capillary sealing potential of Cretaceous mudrocks in the Rovuma Basin, using a mudstone permeability-prediction function and a method for mapping permeability to threshold pressure, allowing estimation of maximum column heights for CO2 and CH4, with uncertainty ranges. Predicted CO2 column heights are slightly less than the equivalent CH4 column heights. The observed CH4 column height at one of the wells is significantly lower than that predicted from mudstone permeability, which is probably due to other factors such as fracturing or gas migration out of the structure. The comparison indicates generally good capillary sealing potential for the Rovuma Basin Cretaceous shales and offers a general approach for assessing CO2 storage potential from hydrocarbon sealing datasets from multiple offshore basins.

This article is part of the Energy Geoscience Series available at https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/energy-geoscience-series

  • © 2022 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for GSL and EAGE. All rights reserved
View Full Text

Please note that if you are logged into the Lyell Collection and attempt to access content that is outside of your subscription entitlement you will be presented with a new login screen. You have the option to pay to view this content if you choose. Please see the relevant links below for further assistance.

INDIVIDUALS

Log in using your username and password

– GSL fellows: log in with your Lyell username and password. (Please check your access entitlements at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/fellowsaccess)
– Other users: log in with the username and password you created when you registered. Help for other users is at https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/lyellcollection_faqs
Forgot your username or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article for 24 hours and download the PDF within the access period. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one. To download the PDF, click the 'Purchased Content' link in the receipt email.

LIBRARY USERS

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
If you think you should have access, please contact your librarian or email [email protected]

LIBRARIANS

Administer your subscription.

CONTACT US

If you have any questions about the Lyell Collection publications website, please see the access help page or contact [email protected]

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Petroleum Geoscience: 28 (3)
Petroleum Geoscience
Volume 28, Issue 3
August 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Comparison of shale depth functions in contrasting offshore basins and sealing behaviour for CH4 and CO2 containment systems

Oscar J. Nhabanga and Philip S. Ringrose
Petroleum Geoscience, 28, petgeo2021-101, 27 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
Oscar J. Nhabanga
1Eduardo Mondlane University, 3453 Avenida Julius Nyerere, Maputo, Mozambique
2Centre of Studies in Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology, Avenida de Moçambique, km 1.5, Luis Cabral, Maputo, Mozambique
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip S. Ringrose
3Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), S. P. Andersens veg 15a, Trondheim 7031, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip S. Ringrose
  • For correspondence: [email protected]

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Comparison of shale depth functions in contrasting offshore basins and sealing behaviour for CH4 and CO2 containment systems

Oscar J. Nhabanga and Philip S. Ringrose
Petroleum Geoscience, 28, petgeo2021-101, 27 June 2022, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-101
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Petroleum Geoscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of shale depth functions in contrasting offshore basins and sealing behaviour for CH4 and CO2 containment systems
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Petroleum Geoscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Petroleum Geoscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
Bookmark this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Estimation of capillary sealing potential
    • Rationale for the inter-basin comparison
    • Summary of mechanical and chemical controls on compaction
    • Approach used in this study
    • Results
    • Discussion of inter-basin basin comparisons
    • Summary of findings
    • Discussion and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Author contributions
    • Funding
    • Competing interests
    • Data availability
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Petrographic and diagenetic investigation of the distal Triassic ‘Budleighensis’ fluvial system in the Solway and Carlisle Basins for potential CO2 storage
  • Study on the effect of pore-scale heterogeneity and flow rate during repetitive two-phase fluid flow in microfluidic porous media
Show more: Energy Geoscience Series
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Petrographic and diagenetic investigation of the distal Triassic ‘Budleighensis’ fluvial system in the Solway and Carlisle Basins for potential CO2 storage
  • The design of an open-source carbonate reservoir model
  • The principles of helium exploration
  • Geoscience and decarbonization: current status and future directions
  • Geoscience for CO2 storage: an introduction to the thematic collection
More...

Petroleum Geoscience

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

 

EAGE logo

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
1354-0793
Online ISSN 
2041-496X

Copyright © 2022 EAGE/Geological Society of London